Skip to main content

Dirty Water

His Majesty King Charles I, namesake of the Charles River in Massachusetts

In the early 17th century, Captain John Smith completed a survey of much of the land that would later be called New England.  When Captain Smith returned to England to present his findings to King Charles I, he showed him a map of the new land and suggested to His Majesty that he should feel free to change any of the “barbarous names” on the map to more “civilized” ones.  King Charles did decide to exercise this privilege, and switched out four of the “barbarous names” he found.  One of those names that the king felt had no place in civilization was the name of a river, which was henceforth called the Charles River.  (That river’s long-forgotten “barbarous” name was the ponderously long “Massachusetts River”.  Thank heaven we don’t have to wrap our mouths around a word like that anymore.)

The Charles is not very long, as rivers go.  It’s about 80 miles long, and drains roughly 380 square miles of land.  Before the arrival of European settlers, the indigenous people of the area, the Massachusett, used the river for transportation and fishing.  European settlers did that for a while, too, but eventually realized the potential for the expansion of industry along the river.  Starting in 1640, mills started appearing on the riverbank.  Before long, the river wasn’t so useful for transportation, as dams started to appear.  The Moody Street Dam in modern Waltham, completed in 1814, created a 200-acre mill pond.  The dam was constructed to power cotton mills in the area, but the pond proved popular for boaters who flocked to the site for recreation.

More and more dams were built as industry flourished along the river.  In the 9½-mile stretch of the Charles between Watertown and Boston Harbor, there were 83 different mills alone!  While dams made navigation along the river difficult, industry made fishing impossible.  The once plentiful fish populations of the Charles were wiped out by industrial pollution.  By 1875, most of the Charles was too polluted to support any kind of fishing industry at all, or even recreational fishing.

Norumbega Park in Auburndale, Massachusetts, a popular boating site when the river was cleaner.

In 1908, landscape architect Charles Eliot came to the city government of Boston with a plan to change this terrible development.  A large cause of pollution in the Charles was the fact that the last 9½ miles of the river were a tidal estuary, which pulled pollution upstream from Boston Harbor.  Eliot’s vision was to build a dam at the mouth of the river to stem the intake of polluted harbor water.  Eliot won over the city government and got his dam.  Better still, he convinced them to require that industry be moved away from the lower Charles River, which also helped to cut back on pollution.  The result was a cleaner river, a cleaner harbor, and a popular new aquatic recreation site called the Head of the Charles.

Due to the cuts in pollution, the Charles River was once again able to cleanse itself naturally, and Boston became a more appealing place to live.  What made Boston even more appealing was the Quabbin-to-Boston water system, constructed in the 1930s, which brought water from the Quabbin Reservoir in central Massachusetts, about 60 miles away.  This increased water source made rapid growth of the city of Boston possible.  Unfortunately, this increased growth generated more pollution than ever before, and the Charles became filthy again.  By the 1960s, it was full of industrial spills, abandoned cars, old appliances, and all manner of toxic discharge this decomposing trash will give off.

In 1965, the Charles River Watershed Association (CRWA) was formed with the intention of cleaning up the river again.  The CRWA advocated for the preservation of the wetlands around the river, as well.  The wetlands were threatened by developers.  The CRWA pointed out that if the wetlands were drained, flooding would be a much greater problem, since the wetlands absorb floodwaters.  The Army Corps of Engineers had been consulted to design and construct new dams to control flooding, but the CRWA stopped them, insisting that keeping the wetlands in place was a better option.  Moreover, the wetlands helped to filter out pollution.  If the river were surrounded by dams, that pollution would rush downstream and into the harbor.

Also in 1965, the Boston rock band the Standells released a song about the Charles River titled, aptly enough, “Dirty Water”.  It was a tongue-in-cheek salute to Boston, ironically celebrating the polluted water, muggers and crime:

Yeah, down by the river
Down by the banks of the river Charles
(Aw, that's what's happenin' baby)
That's where you'll find me
Along with lovers, muggers, and thieves
(Aw, but they're cool people)
Well I love that dirty water
Oh, Boston, you're my home
(Oh, you're the number one place)

The song reached #11 on the Billboard charts that year, and it made its point.  Years later, in 1991, “Dirty Water” started to be played in stadiums after the local sports teams won a game.  Whether or not “Dirty Water” was meant as sincere celebration of Boston at the time, it certainly has taken on epic status among Bostonians (particularly sports fans) today.

The Standells’ single from 1965.

All through the 1970s, the CRWA advocated for wastewater treatment plants and for stricter controls on industrial pollution.  They pushed for the removal of landfills near the river, which bled toxins into the river.  The CRWA also pushed for the enforcement of environmental laws, and pressed the commonwealth of Massachusetts to start cleaning up Boston Harbor, an effort that began in 1983.  Boston Harbor was used as an issue against Governor Michael Dukakis during his 1988 presidential campaign against Vice President George H. W. Bush.  The harbor was in the process of getting cleaned up, but it had only been five years.  The cleanup began under Dukakis’s second term as governor, and the pollution had been accumulating for decades.  In fact, the cleanup effort is still going on.  Today, 74% of the Charles River is considered suitable for swimming in dry weather.  Fish have returned to the river, as well.  Pollution is still a threat, pouring in from the congested land in eastern Massachusetts and the busy highways, which also contribute to the mess.  On July 13, 2013, the first “public swim” in the Charles since the 1950s was sponsored by the Charles River Conservancy.  While things are improving, it still has a way to go.

Scene from the first public swim in the Charles, July 13, 2013


Popular posts from this blog

How the Lemon was Invented

Lemons How do you make a lemon?  Silly question, isn’t it?  You just take the seeds out of one and plant them, and wait for the tree to come up, right?  That’s true, but it hasn’t always been that easy.  Lemons today are a widely cultivated citrus fruit, with a flavor used in cuisines of countries where no lemon tree would ever grow.  You might think that it was just a matter of ancient peoples finding the trees, enjoying their fruit and growing more of them, but that’s not true.  The lemon is a human invention that’s maybe only a few thousand years old. The first lemons came from East Asia, possibly southern China or Burma.  (These days, some prefer to refer to Burma as Myanmar .  I’ll try to stay out of that controversy here and stick to fruit.)  The exact date of the lemon’s first cultivation is not known, but scientists figure it’s been around for more than 4,000 years.  The lemon is a cross breed of several fruits.  One fruit is the bitter orange, best known in the west for

Origins of the Word Hoser, eh?

Rick Moranis and Dave Thomas as cultural icons Bob and Doug McKenzie These days we often hear Canadians referred to as “Hosers”.  It’s a strange word, and it sounds a little insulting, but it’s sometimes used more with affection than malice.  Any such word is difficult to use correctly, especially if you don’t belong to the group the word describes.   I can’t say I feel comfortable throwing the word around, myself, but I can offer a little information about it that might shed some light on what it means. First off: is it an insult?  Yes… and no.   The word hoser can be used as an insult or as a term of endearment; the variation hosehead , is certainly an insult.  It’s a mild insult, meaning something like jerk or idiot or loser .  Its origin is unclear, and there are several debatable etymologies of the word.  One claims that it comes from the days before the zamboni was invented, when the losing team of an outdoor ice hockey game would have to hose down the rink in or

The Whoopie Cap

What can you do with your father’s old hats?  If you were born after, say, 1955, the answer is probably “Not much.”  Men were still wearing fedoras in the 1970s and 1980s, but by 1990, fashion had turned to the point where unless you were Indiana Jones, the hat didn’t look right.  Some blame Jack Kennedy for starting it all, strutting around perfectly coiffed and bare-headed in the early 1960s.  In 1953, Harry Truman, a haberdasher by trade, stepped out of office, and just eight years later we had a president who didn’t care for hats?  The times, they were a-changin’. If you set the WABAC machine to the 1920s or 1930s (when Indiana Jones was supposed to have lived), you would see the fedora was still very much in style.  Men just didn’t leave the house without a hat of some kind, and for what remained of the middle class, the fedora was the topper of choice.  But like any other piece of clothing, hats wear out, too.  When that happened, you’d just throw it away.  Though if there were