Skip to main content

Synanon: Self-Help Through Shame and Berating


In 1958, a recovering alcoholic named Chuck Dietrich discovered he had a talent for public speaking.  He was always a big hit at his Alcoholics Anonymous meetings, so he figured he’d take his talents and his $33 monthly unemployment check and try to give back to society.  Dietrich found he’d benefited greatly from A.A., but he was concerned about drug addicts, who weren’t admitted to the organization, because, as A.A. says, drug addiction is fundamentally different from alcohol addiction, and thus would require wholly different kinds of treatment.  Dietrich set out to help drug addicts and anyone else who needed support and organization in their lives.  That’s why he founded a two-year program called Synanon.

The idea behind Synanon was to hold nothing back, because your chemical dependency was probably a symptom of your repressed emotions.  Synanon’s main activity was something Dietrich called The Game, which was designed to release these emotions.  To play The Game, all you did was sit in a circle and say what you felt about anything, about anyone, about the others in the room, about yourself.  You were to hold nothing back, no matter how cruel and abusive you might get.  You could get as verbally abusive as you wanted, but physical violence was strictly forbidden.  So were drugs and alcohol, of course.  “Talk dirty and live clean” was an oft-repeated mantra of Dietrich’s.

Dietrich’s vision of a two-year program didn’t last long.  Before too long, he came to think that no one could ever recover from their needs, from their emotions, so once you were in, playing The Game, it was permanent.  Dietrich zealously believed in his vision, and he could sell it to prospects by using his own story.  By age 45, Dietrich had been divorced twice, an alcoholic, and chronically unemployed, but The Game turned his life around!  Junkies and others at the end of their ropes, looking for something to believe in, tended to find their way to the small storefront in run-down Ocean Park, California where Synanon promised it could help them, too.

It certainly helped Dietrich.  Within a couple of years, he was a rich man, and by 1967 he had enough money to buy a resort hotel in Santa Monica, where he was pulling down over $10 million a year.  The West Coast had plenty of New Age cults like this—often religious in nature, but not necessarily—and Synanon was one of the best known ones.  It even attracted celebrities like Milton Berle, Eartha Kitt, Jane Fonda, Buckminster Fuller and Cesar Chavez.  Directors George Lucas and Robert Altman even hired Synanon members to act as extras in some of their films.

Berating others was viewed by Dietrich as therapeutic, though no therapist, then or now, would agree with the value of this method.  Dietrich (not a psychologist himself by any definition of the word) claimed that by tearing people down and exposing their innermost weaknesses, they would be built up stronger.  This, of course, is Brainwashing 101, and it was effective.  This cult was billed as the “longest-running utopian community in America founded on non-violence”, and that much was true.  It was true until 1976, when a session of The Game, played in Santa Monica and in Synanon branches that reached out over four different states, went awry.  A female member of Synanon started berating Dietrich himself.  This was fair game, according to the rules of The Game, but Dietrich apparently didn’t like what he heard.  He got up out of his chair, walked over to the woman, and poured a bottle of root beer on her head.  The era of non-violence was over.

California lawyer Paul Morantz might have been why Dietrich was under such stress.  Morantz won a $300,000 lawsuit against Synanon, claiming that they’d kidnapped and brainwashed a young woman.  Morantz had built his career around investigating and suing groups like Synanon, and the Moonies, and the Church of Scientology, so he likely wasn’t through.  Soon after the lawsuit, Morantz was bitten by a rattlesnake someone had placed in his mailbox and nearly died.  The writing was on the wall.

And here's a copy of the home game.
Things were getting nervous over at the Synanon compound.  Since the non-violence taboo had been broken, disciplinary methods started to change.  Children on the Synanon compound started to feel free to act out as much as they wanted, and cult members decided that kids who were acting out were easier to control if you fell back on the age-old child-rearing strategy of smacking them around.

The wheels really started to come off in 1977, when Dietrich’s wife died and he decided to arm the place to the hilt.  He formed what he called the “Imperial Marines”, stockpiling guns and ammo, and using an implicit threat of violence to intimidate the neighbors.  The Point Reyes Light, a small local paper, won a Pulitzer Prize for a series of columns exposing the escalating violence that was going on in and around the Synanon compound.  In 1978, the Jonestown massacre in French Guyana occurred, where over 900 followers of Jim Jones’ People’s Temple cult famously drank poisoned Kool-Aid and died en masse.  This tragedy alarmed America, and soon after, police raided the Synanon compounds, and The Game was over.  Dietrich was found and arrested.  He was drunk at the time of arrest.  His lawyers pleaded for probation for Dietrich, asserting that he would die in jail if sent there, and won.  Dietrich died a free man, with all his Synanon money, in 1997.  Synanon itself evaporated after the raid, though there’s still a small chapter of it that’s been operating in Germany since 1971.

Journalist Maria Szivalitz, who has researched and written extensively about Synanon and other such “tough love” programs, observed, “Creating situations in which the severe treatment of powerless people is rewarded inevitably yields abuse.  This is especially true when punishment is viewed as a healing process.”  There is such a thing as “tough love”, but you should probably approach anyone who suggests it with a dash of preëmptive skepticism.

Comments

The above article is very useful for the writers to write the book for the author and to improve the knowledge. Thanks for sharing the article.
Anonymous said…
This piece would be improved by the correct spelling of Synanon's founder's name.

Popular posts from this blog

How the Lemon was Invented

Lemons How do you make a lemon?  Silly question, isn’t it?  You just take the seeds out of one and plant them, and wait for the tree to come up, right?  That’s true, but it hasn’t always been that easy.  Lemons today are a widely cultivated citrus fruit, with a flavor used in cuisines of countries where no lemon tree would ever grow.  You might think that it was just a matter of ancient peoples finding the trees, enjoying their fruit and growing more of them, but that’s not true.  The lemon is a human invention that’s maybe only a few thousand years old. The first lemons came from East Asia, possibly southern China or Burma.  (These days, some prefer to refer to Burma as Myanmar .  I’ll try to stay out of that controversy here and stick to fruit.)  The exact date of the lemon’s first cultivation is not known, but scientists figure it’s been around for more than 4,000 years.  The lemon is a cross breed of several fruits.  One fruit is the bitter orange, best known in the west for

Origins of the Word Hoser, eh?

Rick Moranis and Dave Thomas as cultural icons Bob and Doug McKenzie These days we often hear Canadians referred to as “Hosers”.  It’s a strange word, and it sounds a little insulting, but it’s sometimes used more with affection than malice.  Any such word is difficult to use correctly, especially if you don’t belong to the group the word describes.   I can’t say I feel comfortable throwing the word around, myself, but I can offer a little information about it that might shed some light on what it means. First off: is it an insult?  Yes… and no.   The word hoser can be used as an insult or as a term of endearment; the variation hosehead , is certainly an insult.  It’s a mild insult, meaning something like jerk or idiot or loser .  Its origin is unclear, and there are several debatable etymologies of the word.  One claims that it comes from the days before the zamboni was invented, when the losing team of an outdoor ice hockey game would have to hose down the rink in or

The Whoopie Cap

What can you do with your father’s old hats?  If you were born after, say, 1955, the answer is probably “Not much.”  Men were still wearing fedoras in the 1970s and 1980s, but by 1990, fashion had turned to the point where unless you were Indiana Jones, the hat didn’t look right.  Some blame Jack Kennedy for starting it all, strutting around perfectly coiffed and bare-headed in the early 1960s.  In 1953, Harry Truman, a haberdasher by trade, stepped out of office, and just eight years later we had a president who didn’t care for hats?  The times, they were a-changin’. If you set the WABAC machine to the 1920s or 1930s (when Indiana Jones was supposed to have lived), you would see the fedora was still very much in style.  Men just didn’t leave the house without a hat of some kind, and for what remained of the middle class, the fedora was the topper of choice.  But like any other piece of clothing, hats wear out, too.  When that happened, you’d just throw it away.  Though if there were