Skip to main content

The Hanging Gardens of Babylon

The ancient Greeks were the ones who first came up with the concept of the Seven Wonders of the World.  These Wonders translated from the Greek word θεάματα, meaning sights.  To call them Wonders sounds more impressive than calling them sights.  (Sometimes something is actually gained in translation.)  Since it was a Greek list, it’s no wonder that everything on it is either in Greece proper or somewhere in the Greek world at the time.  Since the list dates from about the 3rd century BCE, that was a pretty big world; it included what’s now Egypt, Persia, and even part of Afghanistan.  Of the Seven Wonders, five have been recorded as destroyed by some kind of disaster, either natural or manmade.  The only one that still exists is the Great Pyramid of Giza, and even it has been worn down some by time.

That accounts for six Wonders.  There’s one more on the list that doesn’t currently exist, nor does it have a date of destruction: the Hanging Gardens of Babylon.  The Hanging Gardens were said to have been a massive structure, a wonder of engineering, filled with plants and trees and layers of foliage supported by pillars, and water running through to keep everything blooming.  They were said to have been built by King Nebuchadnezzar II, in the 7th century BCE.  The historian Josephus claims that the Hanging Gardens were built for the queen, who came from the lush, hilly country of Media, so she would feel at home in the city of Babylon.

The thing is, although we know where the city of Babylon stood, and when it fell, we still don’t know just where the Hanging Gardens were.  Some accounts put them in the city of Babylon itself, but this theory is controversial, since there are no extant Babylonian texts that even mention the Hanging Gardens.  This would be like if you read up on everything written about New York City throughout its history and found not even a passing mention of Central Park.  Mentions of the gardens come from the Greek conquerors, who arrived nearly 300 years after the Hanging Gardens were supposed to have been built.  Even the Greek historian Herodotus, who describes Babylon in great detail in his Histories, doesn’t mention the gardens.

The Hanging Gardens of Babylon, one of the Seven Wonders of the Ancient World, weren’t in Babylon at all – but were instead located 300 miles to the north in Babylon’s greatest rival Nineveh.
Artist’s idea of what the Hanging Gardens might have looked like.
Some have suggested that the Hanging Gardens were built not in Babylon but somewhere else.  One theory holds that they were perhaps built near the Euphrates River, which makes sense, since that would give them access to the massive amount of water they needed to thrive.  Another theory suggests that they were actually built by the Assyrians, in the city of Nineveh.  The ancient descriptions of them do match contemporary descriptions of gardens there, of which the city and its king were very proud.  There was also a long series of canals and aqueducts that brought water to Nineveh, which would have made it possible to support such a project.  Also, the name Babylon translates as Gates of the Gods, and there were several ancient cities that went by this proud, yet common, name.  King Sennacherib of Nineveh named the gates of his city after gods, which suggested that he wanted it to be known as a “gate of the gods”.  Because of this, it’s possible that the ancients got Nineveh and Babylon confused, and the Hanging Gardens were, in historians’ minds, moved.

There is still no definitive proof that the Hanging Gardens ever existed.  If they weren’t actually the gardens in Nineveh, then they were either an elaborate myth, or they were constructed outside of Babylon, and archaeologists have yet to dig them up.  Since ancient Babylon is now Iraq, it’s unlikely anyone is going to be conducting any archaeological digs there in the near future.  Once the political situation in Iraq calms down, maybe someone will find something.  Until then, we’ll have to accept that the Hanging Gardens remain buried in controversy, if not under ancient dust, no matter how historians babbled on about them.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

How the Lemon was Invented

Lemons How do you make a lemon?  Silly question, isn’t it?  You just take the seeds out of one and plant them, and wait for the tree to come up, right?  That’s true, but it hasn’t always been that easy.  Lemons today are a widely cultivated citrus fruit, with a flavor used in cuisines of countries where no lemon tree would ever grow.  You might think that it was just a matter of ancient peoples finding the trees, enjoying their fruit and growing more of them, but that’s not true.  The lemon is a human invention that’s maybe only a few thousand years old. The first lemons came from East Asia, possibly southern China or Burma.  (These days, some prefer to refer to Burma as Myanmar .  I’ll try to stay out of that controversy here and stick to fruit.)  The exact date of the lemon’s first cultivation is not known, but scientists figure it’s been around for more than 4,000 years.  The lemon is a cross breed of several fruits.  One fruit is the bitter orange, best known in the west for

Origins of the Word Hoser, eh?

Rick Moranis and Dave Thomas as cultural icons Bob and Doug McKenzie These days we often hear Canadians referred to as “Hosers”.  It’s a strange word, and it sounds a little insulting, but it’s sometimes used more with affection than malice.  Any such word is difficult to use correctly, especially if you don’t belong to the group the word describes.   I can’t say I feel comfortable throwing the word around, myself, but I can offer a little information about it that might shed some light on what it means. First off: is it an insult?  Yes… and no.   The word hoser can be used as an insult or as a term of endearment; the variation hosehead , is certainly an insult.  It’s a mild insult, meaning something like jerk or idiot or loser .  Its origin is unclear, and there are several debatable etymologies of the word.  One claims that it comes from the days before the zamboni was invented, when the losing team of an outdoor ice hockey game would have to hose down the rink in or

The Whoopie Cap

What can you do with your father’s old hats?  If you were born after, say, 1955, the answer is probably “Not much.”  Men were still wearing fedoras in the 1970s and 1980s, but by 1990, fashion had turned to the point where unless you were Indiana Jones, the hat didn’t look right.  Some blame Jack Kennedy for starting it all, strutting around perfectly coiffed and bare-headed in the early 1960s.  In 1953, Harry Truman, a haberdasher by trade, stepped out of office, and just eight years later we had a president who didn’t care for hats?  The times, they were a-changin’. If you set the WABAC machine to the 1920s or 1930s (when Indiana Jones was supposed to have lived), you would see the fedora was still very much in style.  Men just didn’t leave the house without a hat of some kind, and for what remained of the middle class, the fedora was the topper of choice.  But like any other piece of clothing, hats wear out, too.  When that happened, you’d just throw it away.  Though if there were